At Issue
The Advisory Opinions are part of CORE (Compact Online Reference Encyclopedia).
Interpretation of ICAOS Rules
Any state may submit an informal written request to the Executive Director for assistance in interpreting the rules of this compact. The Executive Director may seek the assistance of legal counsel, the Executive Committee, or both, in interpreting the rules. The Executive Committee may authorize its standing committees to assist in interpreting the rules. Interpretations of the rules shall be issued in writing by the Executive Director or the Executive Committee and shall be circulated to all of the states.
Download PDF version of all ICAOS Advisory Opinions. (Take 5 seconds to generate)
Disclaimer: Interstate Compact Legal Advisory Opinions
ICAOS Rule 6.101 authorizes the issuance of legal advisory opinions, allowing any state to submit an informal written request to the executive director for assistance in interpreting the rules of the Compact. The executive director, in turn “may seek the assistance of legal counsel, the executive committee, or both, in interpreting the rules.” Rule 6.101(c) further specifies that any ensuing advisory opinion shall be issued in writing and circulated to all states.
The Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision’s legal advisory opinions are issued to clarify, support, and enforce the rules and regulations governing the Compact. They play a crucial role in assisting states, agencies, and officials in making informed decisions, fostering compliance, and promoting a uniform understanding of the Compact’s provisions and rules. Advisory opinions offer guidance on the application and meaning of specific rules within the Compact framework and provide insight into how the rules should be understood and implemented in specific contexts. This ensures consistency and fairness in their application.
The purpose of the Commission’s advisory opinions is to address specific questions or situations, and to help interpret the Compact’s rules in a practical and effective manner. They serve as a resource for applying the Compact’s rules consistently. They do not create new rules or alter existing ones. By providing authoritative guidance, these opinions help ensure uniform application of the Compact across jurisdictions, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness and reliability of the Compact.