A sending state may impose specific conditions on a supervised individual as part of a transfer request. However, the receiving state must have the opportunity to notify the sending state if it cannot comply with or enforce a particular condition. This issue is especially important for courts to consider. While a judge may order that a condition be fulfilled in the receiving state, that state may decline to enforce it if doing so is not feasible. When the receiving state cannot enforce a condition, the sending state must either (1) withdraw the condition and proceed with the transfer, or (2) withdraw the transfer request and retain supervision of the individual.
Courts may not order a supervised individual to relocate to another state or condition supervision on leaving the sentencing jurisdiction without complying with the ICAOS. The compact does not permit a state to transfer supervision responsibility unilaterally through a sentencing order. Broad geographic exclusion or banishment conditions that effectively compel relocation to another state may conflict with the compact and undermine its uniform transfer framework.