Skip to main content

2.5.1 Deferred Sentencing

Chapter 2.5.1
Effective April 1, 2026

     In addition to traditional cases where an individual has been formally adjudicated and placed on supervision, the ICAOS also applies in certain deferred sentencing situations. Rule 2.106 provides:

     (a) Supervised individuals subject to deferred sentences are eligible for transfer of supervision provided that all other criteria for transfer, as specified in Rule 3.101(a), (b), and (c), have been satisfied and the:

  1. supervised individual has waived their right to trial and entered a plea of guilt or no contest; and

  2. plea has been accepted by the court.

(b) Persons subject to supervision pursuant to a pre-trial release program, bail, or similar program are not eligible for transfer under the terms and conditions of this Compact.

     The key factor under Rule 2.106 is whether the court has taken a formal judicial action establishing that the individual committed the offense, typically demonstrated when a plea of guilt or no contest has been entered and accepted. Once accepted, the individual is no longer in a pretrial status but is under a form of community supervision subject to the Compact’s authority.

     By contrast, individuals under pretrial release, bail, or diversionary programs, where no plea has been accepted, remain ineligible for transfer under the Compact.

     Because state sentencing terminology varies widely (e.g., “deferred sentence,” “suspended imposition,” or “conditional discharge”), the substance of the court’s action, not the terminology used, determines eligibility. Relying solely on state-specific terminology can lead to inconsistent application and disrupt the uniform enforcement of Compact rules. The determining question is whether a court of competent jurisdiction has made a finding or accepted a plea that the individual committed the offense.

PRACTICE NOTE

When evaluating eligibility under Rule 2.106, focus on the court’s action, not the state’s terminology. If the court has accepted a plea of guilt or no contest and placed the individual under community supervision, the case meets ICAOS eligibility criteria. However, if the individual remains in pretrial or diversionary status without an accepted plea, the Compact does not apply.

     In addition to the nature of the adjudication, eligibility also depends on the nature of the supervision ordered. Rule 1.101 defines the term “supervision” as follows:

“Supervision” means the oversight exercised by authorities of a sending or receiving state over a supervised individual for a period of time determined by a court or releasing authority, during which time the supervised individual is required to report to or be monitored by supervising authorities, and to comply with regulations and conditions, other than monetary conditions, imposed on the supervised individual at the time of release to the community or during the period of supervision in the community.
 

New Rule Amendments in Effect

Make sure you’re up to date. Review training resources and guidance now.