Skip to main content

6.2.3 Conduct That May Trigger Enforcement

Chapter 6.2.3
Effective April 1, 2026

     Substantial or persistent noncompliance may result in enforcement action. Examples include:

  • Repeated denial of mandatory transfer requests;

  • Failure to comply with required timeframes;

  • Judicial practices that allow supervised individuals to remain out of state beyond Compact limits without proper processing;

  • Improper warrant or retaking practices inconsistent with Compact rules;

  • Administrative failures such as nonpayment of dues, failure to appoint a Commissioner or maintain a State Council, or failure to comply with corrective action plans.

     Noncompliance that results in a supervised individual being improperly relocated, improperly detained, or left unsupervised increases legal and reputational risk to the state. 

New Rule Amendments in Effect

Make sure you’re up to date. Review training resources and guidance now.