Skip to main content

6.2.3 Conduct That May Trigger Enforcement

Chapter 6.2.3
Effective April 1, 2026

     Substantial or persistent noncompliance may result in enforcement action. Examples include:

  • Repeated denial of mandatory transfer requests;

  • Failure to comply with required timeframes;

  • Judicial practices that allow supervised individuals to remain out of state beyond Compact limits without proper processing;

  • Improper warrant or retaking practices inconsistent with Compact rules;

  • Administrative failures such as nonpayment of dues, failure to appoint a Commissioner or maintain a State Council, or failure to comply with corrective action plans.

     Noncompliance that results in a supervised individual being improperly relocated, improperly detained, or left unsupervised increases legal and reputational risk to the state. 

INSITE Updates

A smarter, more efficient way to manage Compact cases. Built with YOU in mind. INSITE is more than an upgrade to ICOTS.