Although a receiving state may not impose pre-acceptance conditions that impede transfer, nothing in the Compact prohibits a receiving state from imposing lawful supervision requirements after acceptance, provided those requirements apply equally to in-state and out-of-state supervised individuals. Once the receiving state accepts supervision pursuant to Rule 3.101 (or a discretionary transfer under Rule 3.101-2), it may require compliance with its generally applicable supervision standards, including sex offender registration, treatment participation, or psychological evaluation, if such requirements are imposed on similarly situated individuals supervised within the state.
A supervised individual’s failure to comply with a receiving state’s post-acceptance requirements could constitute grounds for retaking. See Critelli v. Florida, 962 So.2d 341 342-44 (Fl. Dist. Ct. App. 2007).