While receiving states cannot impose pre-acceptance requirements on supervised individuals that would violate their obligations under the Compact, the Compact and its rules do not prohibit receiving states from imposing post-acceptance testing requirements on supervised individuals. Upon meeting the eligibility criteria under Rule 3.101, a supervised individual must be accepted by the receiving state without impediment. Subsequently, the receiving state may impose additional requirements on the supervised individual, provided these requirements are applied equally to both in-state and out-of-state supervised individuals. Failure to comply with such additional requirements, such as sex offender registration or psychological testing, could constitute grounds for retaking. The same rule would apply to discretionary transfers under Rule 3.101-2. See Critelli v. Florida, 962 So.2d 341 342-44 (Fl. Dist. Ct. App. 2007).