Compact Online Reference Encyclopedia (CORE)
Looking for information on a specific topic, training, rule, or process? Through one search here, you can find the information you need from ICAOS’ white papers, advisory opinions, training modules, rules and the bench book. All results are cross-referenced with links to make navigation easy and intuitive.
Rules governing retaking an offender under the compact of the
Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision
(a) A receiving state shall notify a sending state of an act or pattern of behavior requiring retaking within 30 calendar days of discovery or determination by submitting a violation report.
(b) A violation report shall contain–
offender’s name and…
… amended September 14, 2016 , effective June 1, 2017. … retake … retaking … revocation … supervision in receiving …
(a) Officers authorized under the law of a sending state may enter a state where the offender is found and apprehend and retake the offender, subject to this compact, its rules, and due process requirements.
(b) The sending state shall be required to…
… enter a state where the offender is found and apprehend and retake the offender, subject to this compact, its rules, and … of the officer and the identity of the offender to be retaken. References: ICAOS Advisory Opinions 11-2006 … enter a state where the offender is found and apprehend and retake the offender notwithstanding case closure] History: …
(a) Upon a request by the receiving state and documentation that the offender’s behavior requires retaking, a sending state shall issue a warrant to retake or order the return of an offender from the receiving state or a subsequent receiving state within…
… requires retaking, a sending state shall issue a warrant to retake or order the return of an offender from the receiving … June 1, 2017. … 2379 … 2378 … 2367 … 2358 … offender … retake … retaking … sending state … violations … 2432 … 2435 …
A sending state shall be responsible for the cost of retaking the offender.
History: Adopted November 4, 2003, effective August 1, 2004.
(a) Upon receipt of an absconder violation report and case closure, the sending state shall issue a warrant and, upon apprehension of the offender, file a detainer with the holding facility where the offender is in custody.
(b) If an offender who has…
… Upon a finding of probable cause the sending state shall retake the offender from the receiving state. (d) If … its warrant and detainer in place until the offender is retaken pursuant to paragraph (c) or supervision is resumed …
A sending state shall retake an offender within 30 calendar days after the offender has been taken into custody on the sending state’s warrant and the offender is being held solely on the sending state’s warrant.
History: Adopted November 4, 2003,…
… A sending state shall retake an offender within 30 calendar days after the …
(a) Except as required in Rules 5.101-1, 5.102, 5.103 and 5.103-1 at its sole discretion, a sending state may order the return of an offender. The sending state must notify the receiving state within 15 business days of their issuance of the directive to…
… and 5.103-1 at its sole discretion, a sending state may retake an offender via warrant. The sending state must …
REPEALED effective March 1, 2014
History: Adopted October 13, 2010, effective March 1, 2011; repealed August 28, 2013, effective March 1, 2014.
(a) Officers authorized by the law of a sending state may take custody of an offender from a local, state or federal correctional facility at the expiration of the sentence or the offender’s release from that facility provided that–
No detainer has been…
(a) Upon a request from the receiving state, a sending state shall retake an offender from the receiving state or a subsequent receiving state after the offender’s conviction for a new felony offense or new violent crime and:
completion of a term of…
… a request from the receiving state, a sending state shall retake an offender from the receiving state or a subsequent … crime offense. (b) When a sending state is required to retake an offender, the sending state shall issue a warrant …
A receiving state shall be responsible for the cost of detaining the offender in the receiving state pending the offender’s retaking by the sending state.
History: Adopted November 4, 2003, effective August 1, 2004.
An offender against whom retaking procedures have been instituted by a sending or receiving state shall not be admitted to bail or other release conditions in any state.
History: Adopted November 4, 2003, effective August 1, 2004; amended October 4, 2006…
An offender in violation of the conditions of supervision may be taken into custody or continued in custody by the receiving state.
History: Adopted October 4, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; amended September 14, 2016, effective June 1, 2017.
Notwithstanding any other rule, if an offender is charged with a subsequent felony or violent crime, the offender shall not be retaken or ordered to return until criminal charges have been dismissed, sentence has been satisfied, or the offender has been…
… felony or violent crime, the offender shall not be retaken or ordered to return until criminal charges have …
Notwithstanding any other rule, a sentence imposing a period of incarceration on an offender convicted of a new crime which occurred outside the sending state during the compact period may satisfy or partially satisfy the sentence imposed by the sending…
… the new crime, the sending state is no longer required to retake if Rules 5.102 and 5.103 apply. (d) If the … state for the new crime, the sending state is required to retake if Rules 5.102 and 5.103 apply. (e) The receiving …
(a) An offender applying for interstate supervision shall execute, at the time of application for transfer, a waiver of extradition from any state to which the offender may abscond while under supervision in the receiving state.
(b) States that are party…
… supervision, the offender accepts that a sending state can retake them at anytime and that formal extradition hearings …
(a) An offender subject to retaking that may result in a revocation shall be afforded the opportunity for a probable cause hearing before a neutral and detached hearing officer in or reasonably near the place where the alleged violation occurred.
(b) No…
… shall be deemed conclusive proof that an offender may be retaken by a sending state without the need for further … report, notify the receiving state of the decision to retake or other action to be taken. (g) If probable cause is …
(a) A sending state may request transfer of supervision of an offender who does not meet the eligibility requirements in Rule 3.101, where acceptance in the receiving state would support successful completion of supervision, rehabilitation of the offender…
(a) A receiving state shall submit a progress report to the sending state within 30 calendar days of receiving a request.
(b) A receiving state may initiate a progress report to document offender compliant or noncompliant behavior that does not require…
(a) At the time of acceptance or during the term of supervision, the receiving state may impose a condition on an offender if that condition would have been imposed on an offender sentenced in the receiving state.
(b) A receiving state shall notify a…
… supervision, the offender accepts that a sending state can retake them at any time and that formal extradition hearings …
(a) The receiving state may close its supervision of an offender and cease supervision upon–
The date of discharge indicated for the offender at the time of application for supervision unless informed of an earlier or later date by the sending state;…
As used in these rules, unless the context clearly requires a different construction-
Abscond – means to be absent from the offender’s approved place of residence and employment; and failing to comply with reporting requirements.
Adult – means both…
Rules governing supervision in the receiving state under the compact of the
Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision
(a) If there is reasonable suspicion that an offender has absconded, the receiving state shall attempt to locate the offender. Such activities shall include, but are not limited to:
Documenting communication attempts directly to the offender, including…